Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 10 of 83

Case 13

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceHigh model uncertainty (margin < 0.10)Substantial expert disagreement

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Flow diversion with coil embolization

Alternative: Stent-assisted coil embolization

Top-1 class score32.7%
Top-2 class score25.7%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 13, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 13, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 54-year-old female presented with an incidentally discovered, unruptured 11.2 mm right internal carotid artery aneurysm with a 5.2 mm neck.

Image observation

On the supplied views, a large saccular aneurysm appears to project dorsally from the internal carotid artery, with the parent vessel and distal branches opacifying normally.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of flow diversion with coil embolization is supported by the aneurysm's large size and wide neck, which may complicate standard coiling. However, the dorsal projection and lack of visualized communicating arteries limit the assessment of collateral flow and potential branch incorporation.

Model uncertainty

The OOF classifier scores for Flow diversion with coil embolization and Stent-assisted coil embolization were close, so the assigned recommendation should be treated as uncertain.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The most significant missing decision factor is the status of the anterior and posterior communicating arteries, which were not visualized and are critical for determining collateral safety.

Explicit evidence used

11.2 mm x 8.9 mm x 7.1 mm aneurysm with 5.2 mm neck | Anterior and posterior communicating arteries are not visualized