Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 24 of 83

Case 28

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceHigh model uncertainty (margin < 0.10)Expert majority (3/4)

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Stent-assisted coil embolization

Alternative: Flow disruption (intra-saccular)

Top-1 class score37.6%
Top-2 class score33.6%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 28, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 28, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 65-year-old female presents with an unruptured basilar apex aneurysm measuring 4.6 x 4.9 x 5.1 mm with a 4.8 mm wide neck.

Image observation

On the supplied views, the aneurysm appears as a posteriorly and superiorly projecting outpouching at the basilar terminus with a wide neck relative to the dome.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of stent-assisted coil embolization is supported by the wide neck width (4.8 mm), which typically necessitates a stent to maintain coil stability. However, the recommendation is limited by the lack of documented assessment regarding the incorporation of the posterior cerebral arteries or the feasibility of preserving the prominent left AICA-PICA complex.

Model uncertainty

The OOF classifier scores for Stent-assisted coil embolization and Flow disruption (intra-saccular) were close, so the assigned recommendation should be treated as uncertain.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The most significant missing decision factor is the specific relationship of the aneurysm neck to the origins of the posterior cerebral arteries, which determines the safety of stent placement versus flow disruption.

Explicit evidence used

4.8 mm wide neck | 4.6 x 4.9 x 5.1 mm aneurysm dimensions