Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 30 of 83

Case 37

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceClearer model preference (margin >= 0.20)Substantial expert disagreement

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Coil embolization alone

Alternative: Balloon-assisted coil embolization

Top-1 class score59.2%
Top-2 class score28.4%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 37, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 37, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 55-year-old male presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage and was found to have a 3mm x 5.7mm x 3.4mm aneurysm with a 3.5 mm neck projecting from the ACOM artery.

Image observation

On the supplied views, a saccular outpouching appears at the anterior communicating artery junction, with adjacent branch vessels visible in the working projections.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of coil embolization alone is supported by the documented 3.5 mm neck width, which may allow for primary coil packing without adjunctive devices. However, the narrative explicitly notes the complex morphology of the aneurysm, which limits the certainty of this approach and suggests that balloon assistance might be required to maintain coil stability.

Model uncertainty

The OOF score distribution was diffuse: Coil embolization alone ranked first, but Balloon-assisted coil embolization remained a material alternative.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The specific geometric configuration of the complex morphology and the precise angle of the neck relative to the parent vessel remain uncertain factors for determining the necessity of balloon assistance.

Explicit evidence used

3mm x 5.7mm x 3.4mm aneurysm with 3.5 mm neck | complex morphology of this aneurysm