Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 33 of 83

Case 41

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceHigh model uncertainty (margin < 0.10)Unanimous expert reference (4/4)

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Coil embolization alone

Alternative: Balloon-assisted coil embolization

Top-1 class score43.7%
Top-2 class score41.3%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 41, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 41, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 63-year-old woman presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage and multiple cerebral aneurysms, including a likely ruptured 4.5mm aneurysm at the left A1-A2 junction.

Image observation

On the supplied views, the intracranial vasculature appears patent with a visible aneurysmal outpouching and associated branching vessels.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of coil embolization alone is supported by the documented 2mm neck width of the target aneurysm, which suggests a favorable neck-to-dome ratio for standard coiling. However, the presence of an irregular aneurysm morphology and the incorporation of branch origins in other documented lesions limit the certainty of this approach without further anatomical detail.

Model uncertainty

The OOF classifier scores for Coil embolization alone and Balloon-assisted coil embolization were close, so the assigned recommendation should be treated as uncertain.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The specific neck-to-dome ratio and precise branch incorporation of the ruptured A1-A2 aneurysm are not fully defined, which are critical factors for determining the necessity of balloon assistance.

Explicit evidence used

4.5mm x 4.5mm x 5mm aneurysm with a 2mm neck | aneurysm projecting inferiorly from the anterior communicating artery complex