Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 2 of 83

Case 5

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceClearer model preference (margin >= 0.20)Substantial expert disagreement

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Coil embolization alone

Alternative: Stent-assisted coil embolization

Top-1 class score57.3%
Top-2 class score13.9%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 5, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 5, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 58-year-old male presented with a Hunt and Hess 5 subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by a 2.5 mm x 2.1 mm anterior communicating artery aneurysm with a 1.8 mm neck.

Image observation

On the supplied views, the aneurysm appears as a small, contrast-filled outpouching arising from the anterior communicating artery complex.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of coil embolization alone is supported by the aneurysm's small dimensions and the documented 1.8 mm neck, which may allow for primary occlusion. However, the superior and medial orientation of the neck and the presence of contralateral A2 filling suggest that maintaining patency of the communicating artery could be challenging, potentially necessitating adjunctive support.

Model uncertainty

The OOF score distribution was diffuse: Coil embolization alone ranked first, but Stent-assisted coil embolization remained a material alternative.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The critical missing decision factor is the precise morphological assessment of the neck-to-dome ratio and the exact angle of the neck relative to the parent vessel, which determines the feasibility of coil retention without stenting.

Explicit evidence used

2.5 mm x 2.1 mm anterior communicating artery aneurysm | 1.8-mm neck directed superiorly and medially