Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 57 of 83

Case 72

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceClearer model preference (margin >= 0.20)Expert majority (3/4)

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Coil embolization alone

Alternative: Balloon-assisted coil embolization

Top-1 class score39.1%
Top-2 class score15.3%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 72, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 72, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 59-year-old female presents with an unruptured 4.6x4.5x3.8mm right posterior communicating artery aneurysm with a 2.2mm neck and a small P-comm artery originating from the proximal neck.

Image observation

On the supplied views, a saccular outpouching appears at the posterior communicating artery junction with a visible neck and adjacent branching vessel.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of coil embolization alone is supported by the documented 2.2mm neck width, which suggests a geometry potentially amenable to endosaccular packing without adjunctive devices. However, the presence of a small P-comm artery arising from the proximal neck introduces a risk of branch occlusion that may necessitate balloon assistance for protection, a factor not fully resolved by the current documentation.

Model uncertainty

The OOF score distribution was diffuse: Coil embolization alone ranked first, but Balloon-assisted coil embolization remained a material alternative.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The critical missing decision factor is the precise spatial relationship between the aneurysm neck and the origin of the small P-comm artery, which determines the necessity of balloon protection.

Explicit evidence used

4.6x4.5x3.8mm saccular aneurysm | 2.2 mm neck | Small P-comm artery originates from the proximal neck