Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 61 of 83

Case 76

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceIntermediate model preference (margin 0.10-0.20)Substantial expert disagreement

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Stent-assisted coil embolization

Alternative: Balloon-assisted coil embolization

Top-1 class score30.8%
Top-2 class score18.7%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 76, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 76, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 69-year-old female presented with an unruptured 6mm x 8mm x 5.38mm right internal carotid artery aneurysm with a 4.2mm neck.

Image observation

On the supplied views, a saccular outpouching appears to arise from the communicating segment of the internal carotid artery, with the parent vessel and distal branches opacifying normally.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of stent-assisted coil embolization is supported by the documented 4.2mm neck width, which suggests a wide-necked morphology that may require adjunctive scaffolding for coil stability. However, the rationale is limited by the explicit finding that the posterior communicating artery is not visualized, preventing confirmation of branch incorporation or collateral dependence.

Model uncertainty

The OOF score distribution was diffuse: Stent-assisted coil embolization ranked first, but Balloon-assisted coil embolization remained a material alternative.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The most significant missing decision factor is the visualization of the posterior communicating artery, which is necessary to determine if the aneurysm neck incorporates a branch vessel that would contraindicate stent placement.

Explicit evidence used

6mm x 8mm x 5.38mm aneurysm with 4.2mm neck | Posterior communicating arteries are not visualized