Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 66 of 83

Case 81

Neither Top-1 nor Top-2 matches an expert referenceClearer model preference (margin >= 0.20)Expert majority (3/4)

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Coil embolization alone

Alternative: Balloon-assisted coil embolization

Top-1 class score63.7%
Top-2 class score25.1%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 81, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 81, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 37-year-old female patient presents with a 7 mm x 7 mm x 8 mm right supraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm projecting medially and dorsally.

Image observation

On the supplied views, the aneurysm appears as a distinct, rounded contrast-filled outpouching arising from the supraclinoid internal carotid artery.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of coil embolization alone is supported by the documented absence of a posterior communicating artery and the normal caliber of the anterior choroidal artery, suggesting a lack of critical branch incorporation. However, the specific neck width and dome-to-neck ratio are not explicitly quantified in the narrative, which limits the ability to confirm the feasibility of simple coiling without adjunctive devices.

Model uncertainty

The OOF classifier showed a relatively clear preference for Coil embolization alone over Balloon-assisted coil embolization, but its scores are not probabilities of clinical correctness.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The most significant missing decision factor is the precise aneurysm neck width and dome-to-neck ratio, which are critical for determining the stability of coils without balloon assistance.

Explicit evidence used

7 mm x 7 mm x 8 mm supraclinoid aneurysm | No visualized posterior communicating artery