Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 67 of 83

Case 82

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceClearer model preference (margin >= 0.20)Expert majority (3/4)

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Coil embolization alone

Alternative: Balloon-assisted coil embolization

Top-1 class score65.1%
Top-2 class score24.0%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 82, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 82, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 60-year-old female presented with a thunderclap headache and a documented left supraclinoid ICA aneurysm measuring 3.8 mm x 5.2 mm with a 1.9 mm neck.

Image observation

On the supplied views, the aneurysm appears as a distinct contrast-filled outpouching arising from the supraclinoid internal carotid artery.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The documented aneurysm dimensions and neck width suggest a morphology that may be amenable to endovascular coiling. However, the specific dome-to-neck ratio and the presence of a small posterior communicating artery are not fully detailed in the narrative to definitively rule out the need for balloon assistance.

Model uncertainty

The OOF classifier showed a relatively clear preference for Coil embolization alone over Balloon-assisted coil embolization, but its scores are not probabilities of clinical correctness.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The precise geometric configuration of the aneurysm neck and its relationship to the posterior communicating artery origin are not explicitly defined, limiting the certainty of coil stability without adjunctive devices.

Explicit evidence used

Left supraclinoid ICA aneurysm 3.8 mm x 5.2 mm x 3.8 mm with 1.9 mm neck | Small posterior communicating artery without significant contribution