Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 70 of 83

Case 85

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceIntermediate model preference (margin 0.10-0.20)Expert majority (3/4)

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Coil embolization alone

Alternative: Flow diversion alone

Top-1 class score40.6%
Top-2 class score24.3%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 85, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 85, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 53-year-old female presented with a subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by a ruptured right middle cerebral artery aneurysm.

Image observation

On the supplied views, a large saccular aneurysm appears to arise from the right MCA bifurcation, with contrast filling the M1 segment and distal branches.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of coil embolization alone is supported by the documented 2.8-mm neck width, which suggests a geometry potentially amenable to endovascular occlusion. However, the large aneurysm dimensions (12.6 mm) and the context of a ruptured MCA bifurcation lesion may limit the durability of coiling alone, as the model uncertainty indicates flow diversion remains a material alternative.

Model uncertainty

The OOF score distribution was diffuse: Coil embolization alone ranked first, but Flow diversion alone remained a material alternative.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The most significant missing decision factor is the specific assessment of branch vessel incorporation at the bifurcation, which is critical for determining the feasibility of flow diversion versus coiling.

Explicit evidence used

Ruptured right MCA aneurysm | Aneurysm dimensions 12.6mm x 10.6mm x 9.0mm with 2.8-mm neck