Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 73 of 83

Case 88

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceIntermediate model preference (margin 0.10-0.20)Substantial expert disagreement

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Coil embolization alone

Alternative: Stent-assisted coil embolization

Top-1 class score38.0%
Top-2 class score22.6%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 88, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 88, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 70-year-old female presents with an incidental, unruptured 10.7mm x 9.6mm x 8mm aneurysm of the right MCA angular (M3) branch.

Image observation

On the supplied views, a well-circumscribed aneurysm appears at the distal MCA distribution with a visible neck connecting to the parent vessel.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of coil embolization alone is supported by the aneurysm's well-circumscribed morphology and distal M3 location, which may allow for stable coil packing without adjunctive devices. However, the large sac dimensions and the presence of significant distal flow delay and avascular regions suggest that the aneurysm neck width and potential branch incorporation remain critical, yet undocumented, factors that could necessitate stent assistance.

Model uncertainty

The OOF score distribution was diffuse: Coil embolization alone ranked first, but Stent-assisted coil embolization remained a material alternative.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The most significant missing decision factor is the precise aneurysm neck width and the exact relationship of the neck to the angular branch origin, which determines the feasibility of coil retention without stenting.

Explicit evidence used

10.7mm x 9.6mm x 8mm well circumscribed aneurysm | Right MCA angular M3 branch location