Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 72 of 83

Case 87

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceHigh model uncertainty (margin < 0.10)Expert majority (3/4)

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Flow diversion alone

Alternative: Coil embolization alone

Top-1 class score27.2%
Top-2 class score26.2%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 87, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 87, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 52-year-old female presents for elective treatment of unruptured right internal carotid artery aneurysms located at the posterior communicating and anterior choroidal artery origins.

Image observation

On the supplied views, a large, bilobed aneurysmal sac appears to arise from the supraclinoid internal carotid artery, with a distinct parent vessel course visible.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of flow diversion alone is supported by the large dimensions of the posterior communicating artery aneurysm (9.0 x 11.6 mm), which may be challenging to treat with coils alone. However, the presence of a moderate-sized PCOM artery and a concurrent anterior choroidal artery aneurysm complicates the decision, as flow diversion carries a risk of branch vessel occlusion.

Model uncertainty

The OOF classifier scores for Flow diversion alone and Coil embolization alone were close, so the assigned recommendation should be treated as uncertain.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The critical missing decision factor is the precise anatomical relationship of the aneurysm neck to the origins of the PCOM and anterior choroidal arteries, which determines the feasibility of preserving branch patency with flow diversion.

Explicit evidence used

9.0 mm x 11.6 mm PCOM aneurysm dimensions | Moderate sized PCOM artery