Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 77 of 83

Case 93

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceClearer model preference (margin >= 0.20)Expert majority (3/4)

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Coil embolization alone

Alternative: Balloon-assisted coil embolization

Top-1 class score70.1%
Top-2 class score21.8%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 93, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 93, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 52-year-old female presented with a Hunt and Hess 4, Fisher 3 subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by a 4.4 x 4.9 x 3.5 mm comma-shaped left PCOM aneurysm with a 2.1 mm neck.

Image observation

On the supplied views, the aneurysm appears as a distinct outpouching from the posterior communicating artery segment with a clearly defined neck.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of coil embolization alone is supported by the aneurysm's small size and the documented 2.1 mm neck, which may be amenable to simple packing. However, the presence of a dysplastic infundibulum and the aneurysm's dorsal projection could complicate coil stability, potentially necessitating balloon assistance despite the model's preference.

Model uncertainty

The OOF classifier showed a relatively clear preference for Coil embolization alone over Balloon-assisted coil embolization, but its scores are not probabilities of clinical correctness.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The most significant missing factor is the precise morphological relationship between the aneurysm neck and the infundibulum, which is critical for determining if the neck is wide enough to require balloon remodeling.

Explicit evidence used

4.4 x 4.9 x 3.5 mm comma shaped PCOM aneurysm | 2.1 mm neck