Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 78 of 83

Case 94

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceClearer model preference (margin >= 0.20)Expert majority (3/4)

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Coil embolization alone

Alternative: Balloon-assisted coil embolization

Top-1 class score62.1%
Top-2 class score13.2%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 94, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 94, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 48-year-old female presents for elective treatment of an unruptured left A1 aneurysm measuring approximately 4.2 x 3.7 x 3.7 mm with a 1.6 mm neck.

Image observation

On the supplied views, a saccular aneurysm appears at the carotid terminus with contrast filling the adjacent A1 and M1 segments.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The documented 1.6 mm neck width suggests a favorable neck-to-dome ratio that may support the feasibility of coil embolization alone. The small aneurysm dimensions and lack of reported wide-neck morphology provide a basis for this classification. However, the recommendation is limited by the absence of explicit documentation regarding the aneurysm's specific dome morphology or the presence of incorporated branch vessels.

Model uncertainty

The OOF classifier showed a relatively clear preference for Coil embolization alone over Balloon-assisted coil embolization, but its scores are not probabilities of clinical correctness.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The specific dome morphology and the exact relationship of the aneurysm neck to the A1 origin are not fully detailed, which are critical factors for determining the necessity of balloon assistance.

Explicit evidence used

aneurysm measuring approx. 4.2 x 3.7 x 3.7 | neck measuring approx. 1.6mm