Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 79 of 83

Case 95

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceHigh model uncertainty (margin < 0.10)Expert majority (3/4)

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Flow diversion with coil embolization

Alternative: Flow diversion alone

Top-1 class score34.8%
Top-2 class score31.2%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 95, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 95, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 72-year-old female presents for elective treatment of a 1.3 cm medially projecting spherical aneurysm arising from the posterior cavernous segment of the right internal carotid artery.

Image observation

On the supplied views, a large, contrast-filled saccular outpouching appears to arise from the tortuous internal carotid artery, with visible distal intracranial branching.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of flow diversion with coil embolization is supported by the aneurysm's large 1.3 cm size and spherical morphology, which may benefit from adjunctive coiling to promote thrombosis. However, the cavernous location and lack of documented wide-neck geometry or branch incorporation limit the certainty of this approach over flow diversion alone.

Model uncertainty

The OOF classifier scores for Flow diversion with coil embolization and Flow diversion alone were close, so the assigned recommendation should be treated as uncertain.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The most significant missing decision factor is the precise neck-to-dome ratio and the presence of any critical branch vessels arising from the aneurysm neck.

Explicit evidence used

1.3 cm medially projecting spherical aneurysm | posterior cavernous internal carotid artery segment