Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 36 of 83

Case 45

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceClearer model preference (margin >= 0.20)Expert majority (3/4)

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Coil embolization alone

Alternative: Flow diversion with coil embolization

Top-1 class score60.3%
Top-2 class score18.3%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 45, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 45, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 47-year-old female presents with an unruptured, anteriorly projecting, broad-based saccular aneurysm of the left A1 segment measuring 4.8 x 3.9 x 3.5 mm.

Image observation

On the supplied views, a saccular outpouching appears to arise from the proximal anterior cerebral artery, with the vessel course and caliber appearing patent.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of coil embolization alone is supported by the aneurysm's small dimensions and unruptured status. However, the documented broad-based morphology and slight dysplasia at the neck may present technical challenges for coil retention without adjunctive devices. The recommendation appears limited by the lack of specific neck-to-dome ratio data required to definitively assess coil stability.

Model uncertainty

The OOF classifier showed a relatively clear preference for Coil embolization alone over Flow diversion with coil embolization, but its scores are not probabilities of clinical correctness.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The most significant missing decision factor is the precise neck width and dome-to-neck ratio, which are critical for determining the feasibility of coil-only treatment versus the need for flow diversion.

Explicit evidence used

Unruptured left A1 segment aneurysm | Broad-based morphology measuring 4.8 x 3.9 x 3.5 mm