Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 40 of 83

Case 49

Top-2 adds an expert-matching optionClearer model preference (margin >= 0.20)Substantial expert disagreement

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Coil embolization alone

Alternative: Flow diversion with coil embolization

Top-1 class score48.7%
Top-2 class score17.0%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 49, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 49, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 70-year-old female presents with an unruptured 8.7 x 5.9 x 5.6 mm broad-based right V4 vertebral artery aneurysm involving the entire parent vessel.

Image observation

On the supplied views, a saccular outpouching appears to arise from the vertebral artery with the PICA origin visible proximal to the lesion.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of coil embolization alone is supported by the aneurysm's broad-based morphology and the documented preservation of the PICA origin proximal to the sac. However, the involvement of the entire parent vessel and diffuse atherosclerotic disease may limit the stability of coils without adjunctive support.

Model uncertainty

The OOF score distribution was diffuse: Coil embolization alone ranked first, but Flow diversion with coil embolization remained a material alternative.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The precise neck-to-dome ratio and the exact angle of the PICA origin relative to the aneurysm neck are not explicitly quantified, which are critical factors for determining the feasibility of coil-only treatment versus flow diversion.

Explicit evidence used

8.7 x 5.9 x 5.6 mm broad based aneurysm | Right PICA origin is proximal to aneurysm