Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 43 of 83

Case 52

Top-2 adds an expert-matching optionClearer model preference (margin >= 0.20)Expert majority (3/4)

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Coil embolization alone

Alternative: Stent-assisted coil embolization

Top-1 class score47.2%
Top-2 class score12.6%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 52, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 52, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 60-year-old female presents with a recently discovered unruptured right P1/basilar apex aneurysm measuring 5.3 x 5.6 x 6.5 mm with a 3.6 mm neck.

Image observation

On the supplied views, a saccular aneurysm appears at the basilar apex, projecting superiorly and favoring the right P1 segment.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of coil embolization alone is supported by the documented 3.6 mm neck width, which may allow for primary coil packing without adjunctive devices. However, the aneurysm's location at the basilar apex and its dimensions suggest a complex geometry that could challenge coil stability. The recommendation is limited by the lack of explicit documentation regarding the dome-to-neck ratio or specific morphological features that would definitively rule out the need for stent assistance.

Model uncertainty

The OOF score distribution was diffuse: Coil embolization alone ranked first, but Stent-assisted coil embolization remained a material alternative.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The most significant missing decision factor is the precise dome-to-neck ratio and detailed morphological assessment required to confirm the feasibility of primary coiling versus stent assistance.

Explicit evidence used

Unruptured right P1/basilar apex aneurysm | Aneurysm measures 5.3 x 5.6 x 6.5 mm with a 3.6 mm wide neck