Q729Back to all 83 casesResearch use only

Complete cohort - Case 44 of 83

Case 53

Top-1 matches at least one expert referenceClearer model preference (margin >= 0.20)Expert majority (3/4)

Assigned out-of-fold recommendation

Coil embolization alone

Alternative: Flow diversion with coil embolization

Top-1 class score59.1%
Top-2 class score12.4%
Scores rank model classes; they are not calibrated probabilities of clinical correctness.
View A - APOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 53, AP view
View B - LateralOpen full size
De-identified DSA image, case 53, lateral view

View A is AP; View B is lateral, as confirmed by the data provider.

Case summary

A 41-year-old female presented with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by a 3.4mm x 1.6mm x 2.6mm elongated saccular aneurysm at the right ACA origin.

Image observation

On the supplied views, the aneurysm appears as a distinct outpouching at the carotid terminus with a tortuous vessel course.

Model-generated clinical rationale

The assigned recommendation of coil embolization alone is supported by the aneurysm's small size and saccular morphology, which are generally amenable to endovascular occlusion. However, the documented elongated shape and lack of specific neck-width measurements limit the certainty of coil stability without adjunctive devices.

Model uncertainty

The OOF score distribution was diffuse: Coil embolization alone ranked first, but Flow diversion with coil embolization remained a material alternative.

Clinical uncertainty / missing factor

The precise neck-to-dome ratio and the exact relationship of the aneurysm neck to the A1 segment origin are not explicitly quantified, which are critical factors for determining the feasibility of coil-only treatment versus flow diversion.

Explicit evidence used

3.4mm x 1.6mm x 2.6mm elongated saccular aneurysm | Aneurysmal SAH